PROGRAM BOOK PDF

The PDF program is not optimized for mobile view. The virtual program below provides supplemental information to the program booklet.

stile antico

“...composers continued to be trained to compose in the a cappella, ars perfecta style (or what was taken as the “Palestrina” style) for Roman church use long after Palestrina’s time. By the early seventeenth century, two styles were officially recognized by church composers: the stile moderno, or “modern style,” which kept up with the taste of the times, and and stile antico, or “old style,” sometimes called the stile da cappella, which meant the “chapel” style, which is to say the timelessly embalmed Palestrina style, a style that had in effect stepped out of history and into eternity.”


(Richard Taruskin, The Oxford History of Western Music)

The Old Style

Gradus ad Parnassum

Gradus ad Parnassum (tr: “Stairway to Parnassus”) is one of the most enduring and influential texts in western music theory & composition written in 1725 (200 years after Palestrina’s birth) by Johann Joseph Fux (c. 1660–1741). ‘Gradus’ is written as a dialogue between a pupil (Josephus) and master (Aloysius) representing Palestrina:

“By Aloysius, the master, I refer to Palestrina, the celebrated light of music… to whom I owe everything that I know of this art, and whose memory I shall never cease to cherish with a feeling of deepest reverence.” (from the author’s foreword to Gradus ad Parnassum)

“Gradus” outlines a strict method of composition, through “species counterpoint” rules and exercises establishing a harmonic foundation which would influence composers for centuries to come.

An old SFEMS meme

The Pope Marcellus Mass and the Council of Trent

The following text is from the Chicago Chorale (source)

The Pope Marcellus Mass (Missa Papae Marcelli) was composed in honor of Pope Marcellus II, who reigned for only three weeks, in 1555; Palestrina is likely to have composed it in 1562, a couple of popes later. It is undoubtedly the most famous of Palestrina’s choral compositions, both for its undeniable beauty, and for a persistent legend which grew up around its composition. The Council of Trent (1545-63) was convened in response to the Protestant Reformation, to bolster church orthodoxy and eliminate internal abuses. The nature and uses of church music were an important topic of this council, especially of the third and closing sessions (1562-63). Two issues in particular concerned the participants: first, the utilization of music from objectionable sources, such as secular songs fitted with religious texts, and masses based upon songs with lyrics about drinking and sex; and second, the increasingly elaborate, complex polyphonic texture of the contemporary church music, popular with contemporary composers, which tended to obscure the words of the mass and sacred hymns, interfering with worshipers’ religious devotion. Some sterner members of the Council argued that only plainsong (a single line of music) should be allowed, and polyphony banned altogether. On September 10, 1562, the Council issued a Canon declaring that “nothing profane be intermingled [with] hymns and divine praises,” and banishing “all music that contains, whether in singing or in the organ playing, things that are lascivious or impure.”

Palestrina was a brilliant practitioner of polyphonic composition; but his career depended completely on church patronage. When Marcellus II died in 1555, his successor, Paul IV, immediately dismissed Palestrina from papal employment, and hard times ensued for him. Fortunately for Palestrina, Paul IV's death, just four years later, ushered in the era of Pius IV, who was more sympathetic to polyphony. In 1564, according to the legend (and two years after the actual copying of the Mass), Pius asked Palestrina to compose a polyphonic mass that would be free of all “impurities” and would thus silence the purists. Palestrina answered with the Pope Marcellus Mass, and its performance succeeded in establishing polyphonic music (and Palestrina) as the voice of the Church. Palestrina gave the Council what it wanted: clean, singable lines that allowed for clear declamation (and comprehension) of the text; and a smooth, seemingly uncomplicated, harmonically consonant vehicle for the sacred words. The Council participants were appeased, and church music was saved (or so the story goes); composers were allowed to continue to write polyphonic music.

Painting of the Council of Trent

Council of Trent, painting by Elia Naurizio (1589–1657)

Explore our 2025–2026 season!

LEARN MORE